DEADLINE FOR OBJECTIONS: 24th NOVEMBER 2022

Days
Hours
Minutes
Seconds

How to Object.

The developers and Kirklees have pushed the proposed development to a crucial stage, we now have the opportunity to object to it.

It is really easy to do and only takes a few minutes. You don’t need a Kirklees online account and you can submit your objection anonymously if you wish.

Please also share this page with others who may find it useful.

There are 3 ways you can submit your objections.

Guidance for each is on this page further down.

  1. Online Portal.
  2. By Email.
  3. By Post.

Before you start, please read our pointers on how to get the most impact from your comments.

Please Note.

  •  The overall development site has been split into 2 separate applications – You CAN object to both. (Links to both further down)
    • The Main Chidswell Site (1,354 houses and the large 35 hectare industrial estate.)
    • The Heybeck Site (181 houses – split out to try and deliver early.)
  •  Objections are by individuals and not only one per household.
    • A house with 5 people for example, can submit up to 5 objections per planning application!
  • Objections don’t need to be long. A few lines will do.
    • They do need to be valid objections however, which is in the next section.
    • You don’t need to write a huge essay – a short, relevant comment is just as worthwhile as something much longer.

Key Points for All Methods of Objection.

1.  Your objection needs to be in your own words.

While we have written this guide to assist you in your objection, the words and sentiment have to be your own. Please use the information below to make sure your points will have the most impact possible, but write it from your own point of view.

2.  Your objection needs to be relevant to the planning process. 

The list below is all the main ‘valid’ reasons for an objection.

You can click on each one for more information and use it to see which ones you are concerned about – just pick out the parts that apply to you from your chosen point and write as much as you wish on your comment.

This is an important and more recent concern given the ongoing war in Ukraine. Natural England have requested site-specific surveys to assess the quality of the land, but the Land Owner (Church Commissioners for Church of England) has refused to do so. The Land Owner states that the need for new housing and employment outweighs the loss of agricultural land. The Planning Department have admitted they do not know if the land is of better agricultural value than the Land Owner claims and it appears there are no plans to conduct the assessments repeatedly requested by Natural England.

Specifically Skylark & Yellow Hammer which breed on the land in large numbers. The Ecological Impact Assessment states: “with a development site of this scale, some impacts remain significant, and are very hard to mitigate”.
– Years out-of-date Ecological Surveys which have been ‘updated’ by one single walk-over by an Ecologist (employed by Land Owner) in October 2022 after a drought.

Their report based on the October Ecologist walk-over, claims the development will deliver 10% more biodiversity than in its current state. A previous Biodiversity Net Gain report, based on exact same conditions, was assessed at 14% Net Loss so how do the same plans increase by 24%? The net loss in 2020 was advised independently by Yorkshire Wildlife Trust but it appears the Planning Department and Land Owner have ignored the comments made by the YWT Ecologist.

Multiple have been evidenced on site by local community. These species have additional protection in the planning process but are not considered if they are not in the Ecological Surveys. We have evidenced Schedule 1 species: Kingfisher, Red Kite and Barn Owl. The Land Owner has dismissed our evidence to say the species are only foraging on site and not resident. Have you ever seen these species on site? The Kingfisher has been recorded regularly on the waterway just below the site and if waterways become polluted it will lose its feeding ground. This is not being considered in the planning process currently.

Bats are crucial to our ecology and have been reported by the Land Owner’s Ecologist as having ‘no significant activity on site’. We have over 9,000 verified recordings of bat calls in and around the 2 Ancient Woodlands. Have you ever seen bat activity on or around the site?

Woods, fields, streams and fields contribute to climate resilience and act as a cool zone. Changes to land use affect its health and ability to fight climate change

Crucial to many of our lives and that of our children. Especially since the onset of lockdowns restricting travel.

 Loss of green lung that separates Leeds, Wakefield & Kirklees

 Impact on Kirklees Wildlife Habitat Network / Local Wildlife sites. This is an important link in the wider habitat network.

The surrounding buffer has been identified as too small to prevent damage to the Woodlands. Not building on woods won’t stop them being destroyed. There are other impacts that will cause the death of the woods.

Objections from CPRE & the Woodland Trust were redacted by the Planning Department, to remove details of who they were from when published on the Planning Portal.

Specific Guidance by Objection Method.

Click on your preferred option or continue scrolling.

Online.

This is the preferred way, if you have access to a computer and the internet. Your objection will be added to the councils website automatically. Please use this method and advise others to do so where possible.

By Email.

This is the second best way if you have an internet connected computer. NB: This method relies on someone at the council adding the objection to the online portal and carries a potential for error or 'getting lost'.

By Post.

This is the third best way but still worth doing if the person objecting doesn't use computers or the internet. NB: This method relies heavily on the council adding it and carries a larger risk of not being submitted in time.

1. Online.

  • ALSO NOTE – if you sign in and your address is deemed too far away – YOU CAN STILL OBJECT.
    • Use the ‘Continue as a Guest’ solution as shown above.
    • There was a glitch on the planning portal previously that wouldn’t allow addresses from outside a certain radius to  click ‘Next’ if they were signed in. You can object to ANY application ANYWHERE in the country.
  • It doesn’t matter if you choose to remain anonymous or not – that is a personal preference.

You will see a confirmation page which will include your case number.

You WILL NOT receive an email confirming your submission – if you want to keep a record, either take a screenshot of the confirmation page or click the button at the bottom of the confirmation page that says ‘Download PDF’.

2. By Email

  • To make comments on the 2 proposed sites you need to email: dc.admin@kirklees.gov.uk
  • You MUST include the planning refs on the email for your comments to be considered: Heybeck: 2020/92350 & Chidswell: 2020/92331.
  • It would be beneficial to send 2 separate objection emails – one for each site.

3. By Post.

  • The letters should be sent to Kirklees Council Planning and Development Service, PO Box 1720, Huddersfield, HD1 9EL.
  • One separate letter per objection would be beneficial, although these could be sent in the same envelope.
  • Please note the deadline is 24th November 2022, please ensure your letter is sent in time to allow for delivery which is potentially longer than we are traditionally used to.

Thank you for taking the time to read the guide and moreover, thank you for objecting.

It is by taking the time to do it, that we not only help ourselves but also help each other. Not just those of us that are also objecting, but for those who can’t or don’t know that they can or how.

Please share the message and share this page with everyone and anyone you think may wish to also take action.

If these fields were to go, they would be gone forever – never again a source of food for our own country and never again the home of all the wildlife that currently flourishes there.

 

Many thanks,

 

The Chidswell Action Team.